网站地图 北京大学 友情链接
您的当前位置:首页 >> 内容详细页
中国公众参与观察
中国公众参与观察2015年6月合刊
阅读:1342次    发布时间:2015-7-6
 


 
 

2015年第6期(6月1日-6月30日) 总第92

2015年76日 星期一

要闻 Headline

 

立法动态

张德江出席金砖国家议会论坛
Zhang Dejiang attended the BRICs parliamentary Forum

国人大常委会会议分组审议关于实行宪法宣誓制度的决定草案
The National People’s Congress Standing Committee review on the proposal for taking an oath on the Constitution

用“最严”法律捍卫“舌尖安全”
Food Safety Law: Strictest law for food safety

安徽拟制定信息化条例 单位非法披露所采集信息最高罚50万
Anhui Province proposed new regulations which punished illegal disclosure of collected information

人大代表建议启动垃圾管理立法调研 要提高公众参与度广泛征求意见
Deputies suggested to initiate waste management legislation and required the public participation to solicit opinions


行政法治


山东首例附带审查规范性文件合法性行政案开庭
Shandong’s first case of legality review of normative administration documents is now hearing

深圳行政机关因程序违法败诉率高 法官建议行政机关应建立诉讼反馈机制
Shenzhen administrative organs suffers from high losing rate in administrative litigation due to inappropriate procedures

我国国家域名注册量已超1200万 贸仲委解决近3000件域名争议
 Chinese domain name registrations exceeded 12 million
 

“网络敲诈与有偿删帖”专项整治获阶段性成果 我国正加快建立网络信用黑名单
China is to accelerate the establishment of credit blacklist of internet use

 



司法观察

 

最高人民法院公开开庭审理新修改行政诉讼法实施后第一起行政案件
The Supreme People’s Court held a public hearing for the first administrative litigation after the recent revision of Administrative Procedure Law

最高人民法院发布环境侵权司法解释
The Supreme People’s Court issued a judicial interpretation of environmental tort


最高人民法院发布《行政诉讼文书样式》
The Supreme People’s Court posted its administrative litigation document style

陶凯元:提高文书质量 畅通申诉渠道 提升国家赔偿实效
Tao Kaiyuan emphasized the importance of improving document quality and securing the channels for complaints in order to enhance the effectiveness of state compensation


评论精华

 

控烟:如何不只是“纸上最严”
Tobacco control: How to enhance the efficiency of this “strictest regulation”

以权力清单推进行政组织法
“Power list” will promote the enforcement of Administrative Organization Law

去向不明的问题,应引起重视
Charity fund with unclear expenditure shall be investigated

 

 



 

 

要闻聚焦:《国家安全法》修改

媒体评论:(Comments From Media)

 

中华人民共和国国家安全法(全文)

National Security Law of the People’s Republic of China (2015)

国家安全法明确防范抵制不良文化
The new National Security Law clearly fights against harmful information

维护国家安全之根本法律保障
 How the new National Security Law protects national security

国安法:因国安工作限制公民权利应依法进行
 National Security Law: Restrictions of citizens’ rights shall be applied strictly by law

 

本刊评论综述

 

“生于忧患,死于安乐”。国家安全关系到一个国家能否长期、稳定的发展,对于国家和该国国民而言意义重大。为了适应国家安全新形势,本月1日,第十二届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十五次会议通过《中华人民共和国国家安全法》,以基本法律的形式对国家安全领域的事项进行了规定。 新国家安全法的出台,引起了国内外广泛关注。该法被评价为有以下六大亮点:第一, 确立了以总体国家安全观为指导思想;第二,突出强调以人民安全为宗旨;第三,首次界定国家安全;第四,确立了国家安全领导体制;第五,首次提出网络空间主权这一概念;第六,首次规定全民国家安全教育日。

National security relates to the long-term and sustainable development of one nation. In order to respond to the new situations involving national security, the National People’s Congress Standing Committee passed the new National Security Law, which specify the matters in the field of national security in the form of law.

This new law proposed at least six highlights. First, it establishes the overall national security concept as the guiding ideology. Second, it highlights the protection for people as the purpose of security. Third, it defines the national security for the first time in Chinese regulations. Fourth, it established the national security leadership system. Fifth, it puts forward the concept of cyberspace sovereignty for the first time. And finally, it sets for the first time the national security education day.

 

 

视 点

View Point

聚焦高校生源争夺事件
 

媒体评论:(Comments From Media)

 

北大清华抢夺高分生源“掐架”

Peking University and Tsinghua University fight for outperformed student

 

北大清华抢生源闹剧背后的潜伏利益

Behind the fights for high school graduates: What’s the potential profits?

 

本刊评论综述

    

人才的选拔关系到我国高等教育的质量,“得天下之英才而教育之”本身也是为师者的一大乐趣。高等院校在招生工作中通过正当手段引导考生了解学校和专业,并且根据自己的意愿进行选择,对于广大考生走入理想的大学殿堂、完成高等教育意义重大。 然而,作为我国顶尖学府的北大清华却因招生工作而互相掐架、相互揭短,通过各种诱导考生或违背考试意愿的方式招生,着实让普通群众感到汗颜。这种招生工作方式,不仅违背招生工作的初衷,破坏了公平竞争、自由选择的环境,而且人为地增加了高校工作人员的工作负担,浪费了大量的人力、物力资源。同时,对作为被争取对象的考生而言,入学前高校营造出众星拱月的气氛,入学后却缺乏足够的关注,对于学生的成长本身也是一种伤害

 

Student selection and enrollment closely relate to the quality of advanced education in any country. Through such processes, colleges and universities could guide students to better understand the school and departments, and accordingly help them choose the most appropriate place for these young adults. However, a few universities have adopted some more aggressive methods to promote themselves during the enrollment process in order to compete with other universities. Such conducts include excessive promises of scholarship or spreading negative information of opponents. Undoubtedly, these conducts have triggered severe concerns of vicious competition as well as the harm it may introduce to the development of college students. 

 

公告

敬爱的读者:                                                         
       

        本刊已被北大法宝法学期刊数据库收录,即日起读者可登陆北大法律信息网阅览本刊内容及过往期次。谢谢!
                

                                                                               本刊编辑部 

 
 

编辑团队

北京大学公众参与研究与支持中心
主任:王锡锌(北京大学法学院副院长、教授);副主任:李媛媛(北京大学法学博士)
本刊编辑:谢宇(北京大学法学院2013级硕士) 卓昊洋(北京大学法学院2013级硕士)
 

 

 
网站介绍网站地图版权与免责联系我们
版权所有©北京大学公众参与研究与支持中心    技术支持:北京互联信通网站建设   京ICP备09041777号 京公网安备11010802008500号
DHL快递电话 北京DHL 白癜风 指纹考勤机 北京seo 食堂售饭机 北京建站 dhl快递电话 白癜风遮盖液 白癜风遮盖液 白癜风遮盖液 小额贷款 北京企业邮箱 北京高空作业车